Week 10 636 Blog

Question: What primary concerns exist in ethics, validity and reliability in AR? How are you managing these concerns (or how will you) within your study?

I think there are some concerns when conducting research that deal with this question. I will point out how you can manage these concerns. According to dictionary.com, ethics is a set of principles of right conduct. It is the moral choices that a person makes. Validity has to do with how solid your work is, like are the research questions, study sample, methods, and findings properly prepared so that the results you get in your study will be valid. Reliability is accuracy or honesty. There are some things you can do as a researcher to manage these concerns within your study.

According to the 2003 article titled “Research Ethics: Background and Definition,” “Research ethics provides guidelines for the responsible conduct of biomedical research. . . . When even one part of a research project is questionable or conducted unethically, the integrity of the entire project is called into question.” This is why it is so important that you are honest and ethical when conducting your research. It is best to keep your opinions to yourself and keep a neutral stand on what you are researching. “The best a researcher can do is to be conscious of the ethical issues that pervade the research process and to examine his or her own philosophical orientation vis-a-vis these issues” (Merriam & Tisdell, 2009).

Merriam & Tisdell (2009) also quote Patton (2015): “The trustworthiness of the data is tied directly to the trustworthiness of who is collecting and analyzing the data and their demonstrated competence.”  You want to show that your data is valid and trustworthy; otherwise, why would anyone want to read it?

Merriam & Tisdell (2009) add that “Validity and reliability can be approached through the attention to the way the data is collected, analyzed and interpreted.” Probably the best known strategy for ensuring internal validity of a study is triangulation. This is when you use multiple sources of data to confirm findings. Triangulation “is a powerful strategy for increasing the credibility or internal validity of your research.” I think this is the best and easiest way to

validate your research. By using a variety of resources you can validate your

findings and confirm that what and how you are researching is true to your knowledge.

Merriam & Tisdell (2009) state that “Reliability refers to the extent that the research findings can be replicated.” This is when someone tries your research and gets about the same results. Sure, some of the results may be a little different depending on the person and the students they are doing the research with but, overall, they should have almost similar results.

Merriam and Tisdell (2009) suggest strategies researchers can use to ensure consistency and dependability, including triangulation, peer examination, investigators’ position, and the audit trail.

I think an audit trail would be another great one to use. This is when you keep track of all of your research activities—sort of your journey through your research. I think you should keep track of what you did each time and who was the group you were working with, the time, day, and other things such as that. It is good to keep track of everything you did with that group on that day. You can then compare days to see if results vary.

If you follow what Merriam and Tisdell suggest, I think you will manage your concerns within your study and come out with a reliable, valid and trustworthy research that others will be able to use and study if they wish too.

References

Ethics. (2015) American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fifth Edition. Retrieved November 3 2015 from http://www.thefreedictionary.com/ethics

Merriam, S., & Tisdell, E. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Research Ethics: Background and Definition. (2003). Retrieved November 4, 2015, from http://www.ahc.umn.edu/img/assets/26104/Research_Ethics.pdf

Validity. (2015). Dictionary.com Unabridged. Retrieved November 03, 2015, from Dictionary.com website: http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/validity

Advertisements

4 thoughts on “Week 10 636 Blog

  1. I think triangulation is also a great way to keep the data collection process more interesting. I think I would get really bored if I did the same type of collection every time, it helps me knowing that on certain days I will be doing different things. I get bored observing everyday, maybe that’s just me though. So in my mind that’s another reason why triangulation helps with the validity of the research process. We are forced to look from different viewpoints, and not just from what we see, but also what the kids actually think. I also think an audit trail is great as we are working with kids and if their parents ever wanted to know exactly what we did, since it involved their child, we could tell them exactly, and they would be able to see it, not just take what we say as truth. Sometimes they need to see and not just hear.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. I also agree that triangulation is a good way to ensure validity in research. If we only collect data using one source, such as observations, we might miss things a different data source could reveal. Our research could also be biased if we are only seeing things from our own point of view.

    Good job this week! Your post was easy to follow and understand.

    Like

  3. I like when you said, “It is best to keep your opinions to yourself and keep a neutral stand on what you are researching.” I think this is so hard. For me having a template to record observations has helped so much with this. It has kept me focused on the task at hand.

    Liked by 1 person

  4. “Sure, some of the results may be a little different depending on the person and the students they are doing the research with but, overall, they should have almost similar results.” While I partially agree with this statement, I think it is more important that your results “make sense.” Can the reader come to the same conclusion that you did using the same data?

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s